Posts Tagged ‘manipulation’

November 8th, 2011

Learning hand motions from humans - article


Autonomous motion planning of a hand-arm robotic system based on captured human-like hand postures
Jan Rosell, Raúl Suárez, Carlos Rosales, Alexander Pérez

Although human hands have lots of degrees of freedom, we typically don’t use most configurations. For example, we usually don’t move the last two joints of our fingers independently. Now let’s look at the anthropomorphic robot hand below. Like the human hand, it has lots of degrees of freedom and planning a motion would typically take a lot of time if we consider all possibilities. To solve this problem, Rosell et al. propose to look at what motions humans do, and use the information to limit the motions the robot hand should be doing.

Industrial robot Stäubli TX 90 with the mechanical hand Schunk Anthropomorphic Hand.

To learn about human hand motion they fitted a human with a sensorized glove and recorded its movements. The human movements were then translated into robot coordinates. Using a technique called Principal Component Analysis, the robot is able to extract the most important motions that humans do. By combining these principal motions with a planner to make sure the arm and hand don’t collide with the environment or their own parts, the robot is able to perform human-like motion using little computation.

The approach was validated in simulation and using a four finger anthropomorphic mechanical hand (17 joints with 13 in- dependent degrees of freedom) assembled on an industrial robot (6 independent degrees of freedom).

| More

Related posts

September 12th, 2011

Data-driven grasping - article


Data-driven grasping
Corey Goldfeder, Peter K. Allen

As robots enter our industries and homes, they will be required to manipulate a large diversity of objects with unknown shapes, sizes and orientations. One approach would be to have the robot spend time building a precise model of the object of interest and then performing an optimal grasp using inverse kinematics.

Instead, Goldfeder et al. propose data-driven grasping, a fast approach that does not require precise sensing. The idea is that the robot builds a database of possible grasps suitable for a large variety of shapes. When a new object is presented to the robot, it selects a shape from the database that is similar and performs the corresponding grasp. This matching phase can even be performed with partial sensor data.

Experiments were conducted both in simulation and using HERB, a home exploring robotic butler platform developed by Intel Research and CMU. HERB has a Barrett hand mounted on a Barrett WAM arm and is equipped with a 2 megapixel webcam, which is the only sensor used during trials. Results can be seen in the excellent video below showing the robot grasping toy planes, gloves and even a ukulele!

Just in case you want to build your own data-driven grasper, here are the main steps taken from the publication:

Step 1: Creating a grasp database of 3D models annotated with precomputed grasps and quality scores.
Step 2: Indexing the database for retrieval using partial 3D geometry.
Step 3: Finding matches in the database using only the sensor data, which is typically incomplete.
Step 4: Aligning the object to each of the matched models from the database.
Step 5: Selecting a grasp from the candidate grasps provided by the aligned matches.
Step 6: Executing the grasp and evaluating the results.

| More

Related posts

July 22nd, 2010

Vision, force and touch for manipulation - article


Reliable non-prehensile door opening through the combination of vision, tactile and force feedback
Mario Prats, Pedro J. Sanz, Angel P. del Pobil

Manipulating objects is still a major challenge for robots in human-centered environments. To overcome this hurdle, Prats et al. propose to combine vision, force and tactile sensing to achieve robust and reliable manipulation with a robot arm fitted with a 3-finger hand (see video below).

Using three sensing modalities increases the robustness of the system, especially since each sensor taken alone has its shortcomings. For example, vision can be used to track a manipulated object and can therefor be used to control manipulation. However, vision is sometimes badly calibrated or occluded. Furthermore, forces applied to the robot arm can be measured to make sure the efforts are focussed in the right direction. However, if the robot does not have a good grip on the object it is manipulating, this might cause it to slip. Adding tactile sensing instead is useful to feel the object manipulated and readjust the position of the manipulator when errors occur.

To prove their point, Prats et al. test different combinations of all three sensor modalities on a tricky task for robots, opening a sliding door. In the end, it seems that a combination of vision, force and tactile sensing saves the day.

| More

Related posts